USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Bean Logik LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Bean ranks #34,419 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 1 technology areas.

#34,419
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
3rd percentile
by Innovation Score (14.4/100)
6.1
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R34419 · US Corporation #34,419 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • MID-PACK #34,419/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Bangor University
  • CPC-NARROW A47J · 1 areas
  • INNOV-LOW 14.4/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.1 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Bangor University (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Bean’s 14.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Bean

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Bean's Innovation Score is 14.4/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Bean?

Each dot is one of Bean’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Bean’s own 6.1 claims/patent is at or below the 15.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Bean vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 6.97.07.077.07.07.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Bangor University - 7, 13.86Bangor UniversityBar Evolution LLC - 7, 24.71Bar EvolutionBayco Products, Inc. - 7, 15.71Bayco ProductsBayou HoldCo, Inc. - 7, 20.43Bayou HoldcoBeeper Avionics Inc. - 7, 21.57Beeper AvionicsBeijing Dream Ink Technologies Co., Ltd. - 7, 10.43Beijing Dream InkBeijing Jingyunmake Technology Co., Ltd. - 7, 1Beijing Jingyunma…Beijing NED+AR Display Technology Co., Ltd. - 7, 18.29Beijing NED+AR Di…Bean Logik LLC - 7, 6.14Bean Logik
Bean vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Bean's grants concentrate

Bean Logik LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 28.6% of grants classified under A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Bean sits between Bangor University and Beijing NED+AR Display Technology Co., Ltd..

Who files at Bean's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Bean holds 7 patents at rank #34,504, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Bean

By rank, the assignees closest to #34,504 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47J (Kitchen Equipment)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Bean's primary technology class.

Bean's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

14 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 201620182019 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Bean Logik LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 14.3%
2018 5 71.4%
2019 1 14.3%

Which technologies does Bean Logik LLC patent most?

Top 1 of 1 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Bean Logik LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Bean Logik LLC's lead technology class is A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages), 28.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47J
  • Ranked #34,419 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Bean Logik LLC against Bangor University, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 14.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.