USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Batmark Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 20 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A24F (Smokers' REQUISITES; Match BOXES; Simulated Smoking Devices).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Batmark ranks #14,481 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 20 patents across 8 technology areas.

#14,481
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
39th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.7/100)
18.7
avg claims per patent
+0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R14481 · Foreign Corporation #14,481 · 20 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 20 grants
  • MID-PACK #14,481/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Autel Digital Power
  • CPC-NARROW A24F · 8 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 31.7/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 18.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-FLAT +0% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Autel Digital Power Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Batmark’s 31.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Batmark

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Batmark's Innovation Score is 31.7/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Batmark?

Each dot is one of Batmark’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Batmark’s own 18.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 5.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Batmark vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 19.919.92020.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Autel Digital Power Co., Ltd. - 20, 1Autel Digital Pow…Automotive Research & Test Center - 20, 11.7Automotive Resear…AvanStrate Inc. - 20, 10.9AvanstrateB-O-F Corporation - 20, 1.95B-o-fBetapack, S.A.U. - 20, 5.6Betapack UBfkw, LLC - 20, 28.45BfkwBGC Partners, L.P. - 20, 13.9BGC PartnersBigmouth, LLC - 20, 1BigmouthBatmark Limited - 20, 18.7Batmark
Batmark vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Batmark's grants concentrate

Batmark Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 90% of grants classified under A24F (Smokers' REQUISITES; Match BOXES; Simulated Smoking Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Batmark sits between Autel Digital Power Co., Ltd. and Bigmouth, LLC.

Who files at Batmark's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Batmark holds 20 patents at rank #14,480, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Batmark

By rank, the assignees closest to #14,480 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A24F (Smokers' Requisites)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Batmark's primary technology class.

Batmark's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 201520172018201920202021 5
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Batmark Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 5.0%
2017 3 15.0%
2018 2 10.0%
2019 4 20.0%
2020 5 25.0%
2021 5 25.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Batmark Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Batmark Limited's lead technology class is A24F (Smokers' REQUISITES; Match BOXES; Simulated Smoking Devices), 90% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A24F
  • Ranked #14,481 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Batmark Limited against Autel Digital Power Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 31.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.