Batmark Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 20 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A24F (Smokers' REQUISITES; Match BOXES; Simulated Smoking Devices).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Batmark ranks #14,481 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 20 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #14,481
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 39th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.7/100)
- 18.7
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R14481 · Foreign Corporation #14,481 · 20 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 20 grants
- MID-PACK #14,481/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Autel Digital Power
- CPC-NARROW A24F · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Autel Digital Power Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Batmark’s 31.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Batmark
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Batmark · this assignee 32
Batmark · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Batmark's Innovation Score is 31.7/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Batmark?
Each dot is one of Batmark’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Batmark’s own 18.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 5.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Batmark's grants concentrate
Batmark Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 90% of grants classified under A24F (Smokers' REQUISITES; Match BOXES; Simulated Smoking Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Batmark sits between Autel Digital Power Co., Ltd. and Bigmouth, LLC.
Who files at Batmark's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Autel Digital Pow…
Autel Digital Power Co., Ltd.
20 patents
- Automotive Resear…
Automotive Research & Test Center
20 patents
- Avanstrate
AvanStrate Inc.
20 patents
- B-o-f
B-O-F Corporation
20 patents
- Betapack U
Betapack, S.A.U.
20 patents
- Bfkw
Bfkw, LLC
20 patents
- BGC Partners
BGC Partners, L.P.
20 patents
- Bigmouth
Bigmouth, LLC
20 patents
- Batmark ◀
Batmark Limited
20 patents
What this shows Batmark holds 20 patents at rank #14,480, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Batmark
By rank, the assignees closest to #14,480 in granted patent volume.
- Autel Digital Power Co., Ltd. #14,476 · 20 patents
- Automotive Research & Test Center #14,477 · 20 patents
- AvanStrate Inc. #14,478 · 20 patents
- B-O-F Corporation #14,479 · 20 patents
- Betapack, S.A.U. #14,481 · 20 patents
- Bfkw, LLC #14,482 · 20 patents
- BGC Partners, L.P. #14,483 · 20 patents
- Bigmouth, LLC #14,484 · 20 patents
Leaders in A24F (Smokers' Requisites)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Batmark's primary technology class.
- Altria Client Services LLC 839 in class
- Philip Morris Products S.A. 686 in class
- RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. 430 in class
- Nicoventures Trading Limited 335 in class
- KT&G Corporation 273 in class
- Japan Tobacco Inc. 250 in class
- Huizhou Kimree Technology Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Branch 198 in class
- JT International SA 163 in class
Batmark's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 5.0% |
| 2017 | 3 | 15.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 10.0% |
| 2019 | 4 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 5 | 25.0% |
| 2021 | 5 | 25.0% |
Which technologies does Batmark Limited patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Batmark Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Batmark Limited's lead technology class is A24F (Smokers' REQUISITES; Match BOXES; Simulated Smoking Devices), 90% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A24F
- Ranked #14,481 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Batmark Limited against Autel Digital Power Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.