Badger Licensing LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C07C (Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Badger ranks #15,134 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #15,134
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 38th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.5/100)
- 14.1
- avg claims per patent
- -73%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R15134 · US Corporation #15,134 · 19 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
- MID-PACK #15,134/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Applied Molecular…
- CPC-NARROW C07C · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -73% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Applied Molecular Transport Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Badger’s 31.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Badger
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Badger Licensing · this assignee 31
Badger Licensing · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Badger's Innovation Score is 31.5/100 (38th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Badger?
Each dot is one of Badger’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Badger’s own 14.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Badger's grants concentrate
Badger Licensing LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 84.2% of grants classified under C07C (Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Badger sits between Applied Molecular Transport Inc. and Bionlifescience, Inc..
Badger's three-year grant acceleration
Badger Licensing LLC shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Badger's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Applied Molecular…
Applied Molecular Transport Inc.
19 patents
- Apriva
Apriva, LLC
19 patents
- Ardent Concepts
Ardent Concepts, Inc.
19 patents
- Asceneuron
Asceneuron SA
19 patents
- Barenthal North A…
Barenthal North America, Inc.
19 patents
- Beamr Imaging
Beamr Imaging Ltd
19 patents
- Bellevue Investme…
Bellevue Investments GMBH & Co. Kgaa
19 patents
- Bionlifescience
Bionlifescience, Inc.
19 patents
- Badger Licensing ◀
Badger Licensing LLC
19 patents
What this shows Badger holds 19 patents at rank #15,134, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Badger
By rank, the assignees closest to #15,134 in granted patent volume.
- Applied Molecular Transport Inc. #15,130 · 19 patents
- Apriva, LLC #15,131 · 19 patents
- Ardent Concepts, Inc. #15,132 · 19 patents
- Asceneuron SA #15,133 · 19 patents
- Barenthal North America, Inc. #15,135 · 19 patents
- Beamr Imaging Ltd #15,136 · 19 patents
- Bellevue Investments GMBH & Co. Kgaa #15,137 · 19 patents
- Bionlifescience, Inc. #15,138 · 19 patents
Leaders in C07C (Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Badger's primary technology class.
Badger's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 38th percentile higher than 38% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 21.1% |
| 2016 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2017 | 4 | 21.1% |
| 2018 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2019 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2021 | 2 | 10.5% |
| 2022 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 5.3% |
Which technologies does Badger Licensing LLC patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Badger Licensing LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Badger Licensing LLC's lead technology class is C07C (Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds), 84.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C07C
- Ranked #15,134 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Badger Licensing LLC against Applied Molecular Transport Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.