Where does BAD BOY Mowers, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), BAD BOY Mowers, LLC ranks #20,800 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does BAD BOY Mowers, LLC hold?

BAD BOY Mowers, LLC holds 13 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2025, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is BAD BOY Mowers, LLC's Innovation Score?

BAD BOY Mowers, LLC has an Innovation Score of 40.8 out of 100 (top 35% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does BAD BOY Mowers, LLC focus on?

BAD BOY Mowers, LLC's top technology area is A01D (HARVESTING; Mowing) with 12 patents, ranking #50 of 302 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is BAD BOY Mowers, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for BAD BOY Mowers, LLC.

What does claim depth mean for BAD BOY Mowers, LLC's patents?

BAD BOY Mowers, LLC's patents average 26.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the BAD BOY Mowers, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

BAD BOY Mowers, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01D (HARVESTING; Mowing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, BAD ranks #20,800 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 8 technology areas.

#20,800
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 35%
by Innovation Score (40.8/100): 26.2
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R20800 · US Corporation #20,800 · 13 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
MID-PACK #20,800/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Axial Medical Printing
CPC-NARROW A01D · 8 areas
INNOV-PAR 40.8/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 26.2 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Axial Medical Printing Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How BAD’s 40.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.1 pts (22%) Velocity 6.7 pts (16%) Breadth 10.0 pts (25%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (37%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
BAD BOY Mowers · this assignee

41
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows BAD's Innovation Score is 40.8/100 (top 35% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for BAD?

Each dot is one of BAD’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). BAD’s own 26.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

BAD vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where BAD's grants concentrate

BAD BOY Mowers, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 92.3% of grants classified under A01D (HARVESTING; Mowing). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, BAD sits between Axial Medical Printing Limited and BE Intellectual Property, Inc..

BAD's three-year grant acceleration

BAD BOY Mowers, LLC shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Axial Medical Pri…

13
B & D Dental

13
B&G Plastics

13
B E Meyers &

13
BAE Systems Space…

13
Bandai Namco Games

13
BCS Automotive In…

13
BE Intellectual P…

13
BAD BOY Mowers ◀

13

What this shows BAD holds 13 patents at rank #20,799, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near BAD

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,799 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A01D (Harvesting)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in BAD's primary technology class.

BAD's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

41 Top 35% higher than 65% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

BAD BOY Mowers, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	2	15.4%
2021	3	23.1%
2022	2	15.4%
2023	2	15.4%
2024	1	7.7%
2025partial year	3	23.1%

Which technologies does BAD BOY Mowers, LLC patent most?

A01D - HARVESTING; Mowing 12

B60G - Vehicle Suspension Arrangements 6

B60Y - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Aspects Cross-cutting Vehicle Technology 5

B62D - Motor VEHICLES; Trailers 5

F16H - Gearing 2

B60B - Vehicle Wheels ; CASTORS; Axles FOR Wheels OR CASTORS; Increasing Wheel Adhesion 2

B60K - Arrangement OR Mounting OF Propulsion Units OR OF Transmissions IN VEHICLES; Arrangement OR Mounting OF Plural Diverse Prime-movers IN VEHICLES; Auxiliary Drives FOR VEHICLES; Instrumentation OR Dashboards FOR VEHICLES; Arrangements IN Connection With Cooling, AIR Intake, GAS Exhaust OR Fuel Supply 2

B60N - Seats Specially Adapted FOR VEHICLES; Vehicle Passenger Accommodation NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

BAD BOY Mowers, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

BAD BOY Mowers, LLC's lead technology class is A01D (HARVESTING; Mowing), 92.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01D
Ranked #20,800 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare BAD BOY Mowers, LLC against Axial Medical Printing Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 40.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.