Azimuth Systems, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Azimuth ranks #34,392 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #34,392
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 33rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.1/100)
- 36.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R34392 · US Corporation #34,392 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #34,392/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Axetris
- CPC-NARROW H04W · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.1/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 36.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Axetris AG (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Azimuth’s 30.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Azimuth
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Azimuth Systems · this assignee 30
Azimuth Systems · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Azimuth's Innovation Score is 30.1/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Azimuth?
Each dot is one of Azimuth’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Azimuth’s own 36.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Azimuth's grants concentrate
Azimuth Systems, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Azimuth sits between Axetris AG and Baimmt, LLC.
Who files at Azimuth's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Axetris
Axetris AG
7 patents
- Axial Therapeutics
Axial Therapeutics, Inc.
7 patents
- Axlen
Axlen, Inc.
7 patents
- Axon Pressure Pro…
Axon Pressure Products, Inc.
7 patents
- B&W Tek
B&W Tek, Inc.
7 patents
- BAE Systems Rokar…
BAE Systems Rokar International Ltd.
7 patents
- Baili-bio (Chengd…
Baili-bio (CHENGDU) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Baimmt
Baimmt, LLC
7 patents
- Azimuth Systems ◀
Azimuth Systems, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Azimuth holds 7 patents at rank #34,390, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Azimuth
By rank, the assignees closest to #34,390 in granted patent volume.
- Axetris AG #34,386 · 7 patents
- Axial Therapeutics, Inc. #34,387 · 7 patents
- Axlen, Inc. #34,388 · 7 patents
- Axon Pressure Products, Inc. #34,389 · 7 patents
- B&W Tek, Inc. #34,391 · 7 patents
- BAE Systems Rokar International Ltd. #34,392 · 7 patents
- Baili-bio (CHENGDU) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. #34,393 · 7 patents
- Baimmt, LLC #34,394 · 7 patents
Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Azimuth's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 17,987 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 11,683 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 11,202 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 10,885 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 10,282 in class
- Apple Inc. 6,306 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 3,725 in class
- Intel Corporation 3,691 in class
Azimuth's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2016 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Azimuth Systems, Inc. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Azimuth Systems, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Azimuth Systems, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
- Ranked #34,392 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Azimuth Systems, Inc. against Axetris AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.