Avidasports, LLC.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Avidasports ranks #38,981 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #38,981
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 34th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.3/100)
- 20.7
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R38981 · US Corporation #38,981 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #38,981/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Avanan
- CPC-FOCUS G06V · 10 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.3/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Avanan Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Avidasports’s 30.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Avidasports
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Avidasports · this assignee 30
Avidasports · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Avidasports's Innovation Score is 30.3/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Avidasports?
Each dot is one of Avidasports’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Avidasports’s own 20.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Avidasports's grants concentrate
Avidasports, LLC. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Avidasports sits between Avanan Inc. and AWE Company Limited.
Who files at Avidasports's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Avanan
Avanan Inc.
6 patents
- Aventis Pharma
Aventis Pharma S.A.
6 patents
- Aventom
Aventom Ltd.
6 patents
- Avercon Bvba
Avercon Bvba
6 patents
- Avita Internation…
Avita International Ltd.
6 patents
- AVM Biotechnology
AVM Biotechnology, LLC
6 patents
- AVS Ingenieur J C…
AVS, Ingenieur J.C. Römer GmbH
6 patents
- AWE
AWE Company Limited
6 patents
- Avidasports ◀
Avidasports, LLC.
6 patents
What this shows Avidasports holds 6 patents at rank #38,746, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Avidasports
By rank, the assignees closest to #38,746 in granted patent volume.
- Avanan Inc. #38,742 · 6 patents
- Aventis Pharma S.A. #38,743 · 6 patents
- Aventom Ltd. #38,744 · 6 patents
- Avercon Bvba #38,745 · 6 patents
- Avita International Ltd. #38,747 · 6 patents
- AVM Biotechnology, LLC #38,748 · 6 patents
- AVS, Ingenieur J.C. Römer GmbH #38,749 · 6 patents
- AWE Company Limited #38,750 · 6 patents
Leaders in G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Avidasports's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 3,022 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 2,565 in class
- Google LLC 1,829 in class
- NEC Corporation 1,631 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 1,549 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 1,310 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,287 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,177 in class
Avidasports's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Avidasports, LLC. patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Avidasports, LLC.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Avidasports, LLC.'s lead technology class is G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06V
- Ranked #38,981 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Avidasports, LLC. against Avanan Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.