Overall rank by patents
#25,810
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 3 technology areas, active 2017–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; LABELS OR NAME-PLATES; SEALS).
The verdict
As holds 10 US patents across 3 technology areas, rank #25,810 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
As Seen On PC, Inc. has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2017 and 2025, placing As Seen On PC, Inc. at rank #25,810 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 3 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 2.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; LABELS OR NAME-PLATES; SEALS). As a US Corporation, As Seen On PC, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, As sits between Armorworks Enterprises Llc (10 patents, rank #25,806) and Astec Industries, Inc. (10 patents, rank #25,814) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 18.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 5 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a +0% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. As Seen On PC, Inc.'s 2.6 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 3 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark As Seen On PC, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Armorworks Enterprises LLC
10 patents
Arrival Limited
10 patents
Arstat, Inc.
10 patents
Artiphon, Inc.
10 patents
Ascava, Inc.
10 patents
Ascent Holdings, LLC
10 patents
Assa Group, Inc.
10 patents
Astec Industries, Inc.
10 patents
As Seen On PC, Inc.
10 patents
What this shows As holds 10 patents at rank #25,810, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
As's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
18 Top 95% higher than 5% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2025 | 3 | 30.0% |
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,810
Across all tracked assignees
18.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
As's 10 grants land it in the top 95% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.