Armines
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 24 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10S (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Armines ranks #34,318 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 24 technology areas.
- #34,318
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 46th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.9/100)
- 15.7
- avg claims per patent
- -60%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R34318 · Foreign Corporation #34,318 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #34,318/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH ARK Ideaz
- CPC-FOCUS Y10S · 24 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -60% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: ARK Ideaz, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Armines’s 33.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Armines
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Armines · this assignee 34
Armines · this assignee
34 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Armines's Innovation Score is 33.9/100 (46th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Armines?
Each dot is one of Armines’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Armines’s own 15.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Armines's grants concentrate
Armines is a focused PatentsView assignee: 24 CPC subclasses with 28.6% of grants classified under Y10S (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Armines sits between ARK Ideaz, Inc. and Aron Lighting LLC.
Who files at Armines's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- ARK Ideaz
ARK Ideaz, Inc.
7 patents
- Arlen Ness Enterp…
Arlen Ness Enterprises, Inc.
7 patents
- ARM Norway AS
ARM Norway AS
7 patents
- Armgo Pharma
Armgo Pharma, Inc.
7 patents
- Armis Biopharma
Armis Biopharma, Inc.
7 patents
- Armorlink SH
Armorlink SH Corp.
7 patents
- ARO
ARO, Inc.
7 patents
- Aron Lighting
Aron Lighting LLC
7 patents
- Armines ◀
Armines
7 patents
What this shows Armines holds 7 patents at rank #34,193, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Armines
By rank, the assignees closest to #34,193 in granted patent volume.
- ARK Ideaz, Inc. #34,189 · 7 patents
- Arlen Ness Enterprises, Inc. #34,190 · 7 patents
- ARM Norway AS #34,191 · 7 patents
- Armgo Pharma, Inc. #34,192 · 7 patents
- Armis Biopharma, Inc. #34,194 · 7 patents
- Armorlink SH Corp. #34,195 · 7 patents
- ARO, Inc. #34,196 · 7 patents
- Aron Lighting LLC #34,197 · 7 patents
Leaders in Y10S (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Armines's primary technology class.
- Ford Global Technologies, LLC 747 in class
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 731 in class
- Hyundai Motor Company 498 in class
- iRobot Corporation 216 in class
- X Development LLC 174 in class
- Fanuc Corporation 160 in class
- HON HAI Precision Industry Co., Ltd. 138 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 137 in class
Armines's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
34 46th percentile higher than 46% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 57.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does Armines patent most?
Top 15 of 24 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Armines's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Armines's lead technology class is Y10S (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests), 28.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y10S
- Ranked #34,318 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Armines against ARK Ideaz, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.