Aptar Italia S.P.A.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Aptar ranks #30,860 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #30,860
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 21st percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.7/100)
- 16.1
- avg claims per patent
- +67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R30860 · Foreign Corporation #30,860 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #30,860/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH APL Norway AS
- CPC-NARROW B05B · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: APL Norway AS (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Aptar’s 26.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Aptar
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Aptar Italia S P A · this assignee 27
Aptar Italia S P A · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Aptar's Innovation Score is 26.7/100 (21st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Aptar?
Each dot is one of Aptar’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Aptar’s own 16.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Aptar's grants concentrate
Aptar Italia S.P.A. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 87.5% of grants classified under B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Aptar sits between APL Norway AS and Arix Technologies, Inc..
Aptar's three-year grant acceleration
Aptar Italia S.P.A. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Aptar's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- APL Norway AS
APL Norway AS
8 patents
- APM Automation So…
APM Automation Solutions Ltd
8 patents
- Applied Stemcell
Applied Stemcell, Inc.
8 patents
- Apricorn
Apricorn
8 patents
- Aramis Biotechnol…
Aramis Biotechnologies Inc.
8 patents
- Ariagen
Ariagen, Inc.
8 patents
- Aries Gasification
Aries Gasification, LLC
8 patents
- Arix
Arix Technologies, Inc.
8 patents
- Aptar Italia S P A ◀
Aptar Italia S.P.A.
8 patents
What this shows Aptar holds 8 patents at rank #30,789, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Aptar
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,789 in granted patent volume.
- APL Norway AS #30,785 · 8 patents
- APM Automation Solutions Ltd #30,786 · 8 patents
- Applied Stemcell, Inc. #30,787 · 8 patents
- Apricorn #30,788 · 8 patents
- Aramis Biotechnologies Inc. #30,790 · 8 patents
- Ariagen, Inc. #30,791 · 8 patents
- Aries Gasification, LLC #30,792 · 8 patents
- Arix Technologies, Inc. #30,793 · 8 patents
Leaders in B05B (Spraying Apparatus)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Aptar's primary technology class.
Aptar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 21st percentile higher than 21% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2021 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Aptar Italia S.P.A. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Aptar Italia S.P.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Aptar Italia S.P.A.'s lead technology class is B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles), 87.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B05B
- Ranked #30,860 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Aptar Italia S.P.A. against APL Norway AS, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.