Overall rank by patents
#25,697
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 8 technology areas, active 2016–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES).
The verdict
Applied holds 10 US patents across 8 technology areas, rank #25,697 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Applied Vision Corporation has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2016 and 2023, placing Applied Vision Corporation at rank #25,697 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 8 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 19.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES). As a US Corporation, Applied Vision Corporation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Applied sits between Apana Inc. (10 patents, rank #25,693) and AR Packaging Systems AB (10 patents, rank #25,701) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 31.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 7 in the 2015–2019 window, a -57% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Applied Vision Corporation's 19.5 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 8 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Applied Vision Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
APANA Inc.
10 patents
APEM
10 patents
APHP (ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS)
10 patents
APOS MEDICAL ASSETS LTD.
10 patents
APTON BIOSYSTEMS, INC.
10 patents
AQUA BIO TECHNOLOGY ASA
10 patents
AQUAHYDREX PTY LTD
10 patents
AR Packaging Systems AB
10 patents
APPLIED VISION CORPORATION
10 patents
What this shows Applied holds 10 patents at rank #25,697, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Applied's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 63% higher than 37% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2019 | 4 | 40.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 10.0% |
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,697
Across all tracked assignees
31.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Applied's 10 grants land it in the top 63% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.