Applied Biomimetic A/S
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 19 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01D (Separation).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Applied ranks #23,884 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 19 technology areas.
- #23,884
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 28%
- by Innovation Score (43.4/100)
- 17.4
- avg claims per patent
- +75%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R23884 · Foreign Corporation #23,884 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #23,884/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Apeiron Biologics
- CPC-FOCUS B01D · 19 areas
- INNOV-PAR 43.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +75% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Apeiron Biologics AG (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Applied’s 43.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Applied
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Applied Biomimetic A/S · this assignee
Applied Biomimetic A/S · this assignee
43 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Applied's Innovation Score is 43.4/100 (top 28% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Applied?
Each dot is one of Applied’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Applied’s own 17.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Applied's grants concentrate
Applied Biomimetic A/S is a focused PatentsView assignee: 19 CPC subclasses with 90.9% of grants classified under B01D (Separation). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Applied sits between Apeiron Biologics AG and ARC BIO, LLC.
Applied's three-year grant acceleration
Applied Biomimetic A/S shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Applied's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Apeiron Biologics
Apeiron Biologics AG
11 patents
- APG Polytech
APG Polytech, LLC
11 patents
- Apic Yamada
Apic Yamada Corporation
11 patents
- Apogee Technology…
Apogee Technology Consultants, LLC
11 patents
- Applied Concepts
Applied Concepts, Inc.
11 patents
- Aquaporin A/S
Aquaporin A/S
11 patents
- Aquatech Internat…
Aquatech International, LLC
11 patents
- ARC BIO
ARC BIO, LLC
11 patents
- Applied Biomimeti… ◀
Applied Biomimetic A/S
11 patents
What this shows Applied holds 11 patents at rank #23,821, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Applied
By rank, the assignees closest to #23,821 in granted patent volume.
- Apeiron Biologics AG #23,817 · 11 patents
- APG Polytech, LLC #23,818 · 11 patents
- Apic Yamada Corporation #23,819 · 11 patents
- Apogee Technology Consultants, LLC #23,820 · 11 patents
- Applied Concepts, Inc. #23,822 · 11 patents
- Aquaporin A/S #23,823 · 11 patents
- Aquatech International, LLC #23,824 · 11 patents
- ARC BIO, LLC #23,825 · 11 patents
Leaders in B01D (Separation)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Applied's primary technology class.
Applied's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 28% higher than 72% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2018 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2020 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2021 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2022 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2023 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2024 | 1 | 9.1% |
Which technologies does Applied Biomimetic A/S patent most?
Top 15 of 19 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Applied Biomimetic A/S's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Applied Biomimetic A/S's lead technology class is B01D (Separation), 90.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01D
- Ranked #23,884 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Applied Biomimetic A/S against Apeiron Biologics AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 43.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.