Where does Apollo 13 Designs, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Apollo 13 Designs, LLC ranks #44,767 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Apollo 13 Designs, LLC hold?

Apollo 13 Designs, LLC holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2020, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is Apollo 13 Designs, LLC's Innovation Score?

Apollo 13 Designs, LLC has an Innovation Score of 27.0 out of 100 (22nd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Apollo 13 Designs, LLC focus on?

Apollo 13 Designs, LLC's top technology area is A44C (Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins) with 3 patents, ranking #50 of 186 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

Is Apollo 13 Designs, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Apollo 13 Designs, LLC's recent grant velocity is -75% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Apollo 13 Designs, LLC's patents?

Apollo 13 Designs, LLC's patents average 16.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Apollo 13 Designs, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Apollo 13 Designs, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A44C (Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Apollo ranks #44,767 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 10 technology areas.

#44,767
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 22nd percentile
by Innovation Score (27.0/100): 16.0
avg claims per patent: -75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R44767 · US Corporation #44,767 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
LOWER-Q #44,767/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Anthony Innovations…
CPC-FOCUS A44C · 10 areas
INNOV-THIN 27.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -75% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Anthony Innovations Pty Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Apollo’s 27.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (23%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.2 pts (41%) Claim depth 9.6 pts (36%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Apollo 13 Designs · this assignee

27
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Apollo's Innovation Score is 27.0/100 (22nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Apollo?

Each dot is one of Apollo’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Apollo’s own 16.0 claims/patent is at or below the 20.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Apollo vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Apollo's grants concentrate

Apollo 13 Designs, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A44C (Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Apollo sits between Anthony Innovations Pty Ltd. and Applied Cavitation, Inc.

Anthony Innovatio…

5
Antora Energy

5
Anvilogic

5
Apex Semiconductor

5
Apollo Enterprise…

5
Apollo Neuroscien…

5
Appland

5
Applied Cavitation

5
Apollo 13 Designs ◀

5

What this shows Apollo holds 5 patents at rank #44,902, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Apollo

By rank, the assignees closest to #44,902 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A44C (Personal Adornments)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Apollo's primary technology class.

Apollo's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 22nd percentile higher than 22% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Apollo 13 Designs, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	3	60.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2020	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Apollo 13 Designs, LLC patent most?

A44C - Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins 3

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 3

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 3

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 3

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 3

G06K - Graphical Data Reading ; Presentation OF DATA; Record CARRIERS; Handling Record Carriers 3

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 3

H03K - Pulse Technique 1

H04M - Telephonic Communication 1

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Apollo 13 Designs, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Apollo 13 Designs, LLC's lead technology class is A44C (Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A44C
Ranked #44,767 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Apollo 13 Designs, LLC against Anthony Innovations Pty Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 27.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.