APG Cash Drawer, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G07G (Registering THE Receipt OF Cash, Valuables, OR Tokens).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, APG ranks #38,812 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #38,812
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 42nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (32.8/100)
- 19.2
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R38812 · US Corporation #38,812 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #38,812/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Anthony Liftgates
- CPC-NARROW G07G · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 32.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Anthony Liftgates, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How APG’s 32.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around APG
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- APG Cash Drawer · this assignee 33
APG Cash Drawer · this assignee
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows APG's Innovation Score is 32.8/100 (42nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for APG?
Each dot is one of APG’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). APG’s own 19.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 18.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where APG's grants concentrate
APG Cash Drawer, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under G07G (Registering THE Receipt OF Cash, Valuables, OR Tokens). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, APG sits between Anthony Liftgates, Inc. and Appfolio, Inc..
APG's three-year grant acceleration
APG Cash Drawer, LLC shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at APG's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Anthony Liftgates
Anthony Liftgates, Inc.
6 patents
- AO “Tatkhimfarpre…
AO “Tatkhimfarpreparaty”
6 patents
- Aondevices
Aondevices, Inc.
6 patents
- AP&C Advanced Pow…
AP&C Advanced Powders & Coatings Inc.
6 patents
- Apollo Energy Ser…
Apollo Energy Services Corp.
6 patents
- App-pop-up
App-pop-up Inc.
6 patents
- Appdome
Appdome Ltd.
6 patents
- Appfolio
Appfolio, Inc.
6 patents
- APG Cash Drawer ◀
APG Cash Drawer, LLC
6 patents
What this shows APG holds 6 patents at rank #38,656, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near APG
By rank, the assignees closest to #38,656 in granted patent volume.
- Anthony Liftgates, Inc. #38,652 · 6 patents
- AO “Tatkhimfarpreparaty” #38,653 · 6 patents
- Aondevices, Inc. #38,654 · 6 patents
- AP&C Advanced Powders & Coatings Inc. #38,655 · 6 patents
- Apollo Energy Services Corp. #38,657 · 6 patents
- App-pop-up Inc. #38,658 · 6 patents
- Appdome Ltd. #38,659 · 6 patents
- Appfolio, Inc. #38,660 · 6 patents
Leaders in G07G (Registering THE Receipt OF Cash)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in APG's primary technology class.
APG's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does APG Cash Drawer, LLC patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
APG Cash Drawer, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- APG Cash Drawer, LLC's lead technology class is G07G (Registering THE Receipt OF Cash, Valuables, OR Tokens), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G07G
- Ranked #38,812 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare APG Cash Drawer, LLC against Anthony Liftgates, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 32.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.