Anatomage Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Anatomage ranks #38,780 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #38,780
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 29th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.9/100)
- 19.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R38780 · US Corporation #38,780 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #38,780/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Anacapa Semiconductor
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Anacapa Semiconductor (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Anatomage’s 28.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Anatomage
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Anatomage · this assignee 29
Anatomage · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Anatomage's Innovation Score is 28.9/100 (29th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Anatomage?
Each dot is one of Anatomage’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Anatomage’s own 19.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Anatomage's grants concentrate
Anatomage Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). By volume, Anatomage sits between AnX Robotica Corp and Anhui Hongcheng Opto-Electronics Co., Ltd..
Who files at Anatomage's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Anx Robotica
AnX Robotica Corp
6 patents
- Anacapa Semicondu…
Anacapa Semiconductor
6 patents
- Analog Integratio…
Analog Integrations Corporation
6 patents
- Anatolia Tile & S…
Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc.
6 patents
- Anca Pty
Anca Pty Ltd
6 patents
- Anderson Innovati…
Anderson Innovations, LLC
6 patents
- Angler Labs
Angler Labs Inc.
6 patents
- Anhui Hongcheng O…
Anhui Hongcheng Opto-Electronics Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Anatomage ◀
Anatomage Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Anatomage holds 6 patents at rank #38,896, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Anatomage
By rank, the assignees closest to #38,896 in granted patent volume.
- AnX Robotica Corp #38,892 · 6 patents
- Anacapa Semiconductor #38,893 · 6 patents
- Analog Integrations Corporation #38,894 · 6 patents
- Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc. #38,895 · 6 patents
- Anca Pty Ltd #38,897 · 6 patents
- Anderson Innovations, LLC #38,898 · 6 patents
- Angler Labs Inc. #38,899 · 6 patents
- Anhui Hongcheng Opto-Electronics Co., Ltd. #38,900 · 6 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Anatomage's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Anatomage's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 29th percentile higher than 29% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Anatomage Inc. patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Anatomage Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Anatomage Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #38,780 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Anatomage Inc. against AnX Robotica Corp, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.