Overall rank by patents
#25,778
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2015–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H04N (PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION).
The verdict
Amchaelvisual holds 10 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #25,778 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Amchaelvisual Technology, Llc has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2015 and 2023, placing Amchaelvisual Technology, Llc at rank #25,778 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in H04N (PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION). As a US Corporation, Amchaelvisual Technology, Llc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Amchaelvisual sits between Aluminum Industries Investments Pty Ltd (10 patents, rank #25,774) and Ampac Enterprises Inc. (10 patents, rank #25,782) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 39.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -75% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Amchaelvisual Technology, Llc's 17.7 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Amchaelvisual Technology, Llc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Aluminum Industries Investments Pty Ltd
10 patents
AmCad BioMed Corporation
10 patents
Amber Semiconductor, Inc.
10 patents
Ambient AI, Inc.
10 patents
America as represented by the Secretary of the Army
10 patents
American Louver Company
10 patents
Americhip Inc.
10 patents
Ampac Enterprises Inc.
10 patents
AmchaelVisual Technology, LLC
10 patents
What this shows Amchaelvisual holds 10 patents at rank #25,778, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Amchaelvisual's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
39 Top 38% higher than 62% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 40.0% |
| 2016 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 10.0% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,778
Across all tracked assignees
39.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Amchaelvisual's 10 grants land it in the top 38% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.