Where does AM Conservation Group rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), AM Conservation Group ranks #44,643 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does AM Conservation Group hold?

AM Conservation Group holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is AM Conservation Group's Innovation Score?

AM Conservation Group has an Innovation Score of 30.6 out of 100 (35th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does AM Conservation Group focus on?

AM Conservation Group's top technology area is E03C (Domestic Plumbing Installations FOR Fresh Water OR Waste Water ; Sinks) with 4 patents, ranking #86 of 262 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is AM Conservation Group's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

AM Conservation Group's recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for AM Conservation Group's patents?

AM Conservation Group's patents average 17.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the AM Conservation Group patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

AM Conservation Group

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E03C (Domestic Plumbing Installations FOR Fresh Water OR Waste Water ; Sinks).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, AM ranks #44,643 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#44,643
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 35th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.6/100): 17.8
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R44643 · US Corporation #44,643 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
LOWER-Q #44,643/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Alternative Gene…
CPC-NARROW E03C · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Alternative Gene Expression S.L. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How AM’s 30.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (20%) Velocity 6.7 pts (22%) Breadth 7.1 pts (23%) Claim depth 10.7 pts (35%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
AM Conservation Group · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows AM's Innovation Score is 30.6/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for AM?

Each dot is one of AM’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). AM’s own 17.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

AM vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where AM's grants concentrate

AM Conservation Group is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under E03C (Domestic Plumbing Installations FOR Fresh Water OR Waste Water ; Sinks). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, AM sits between Alternative Gene Expression S.L. and Amag Rolling Gmbh.

AM's three-year grant acceleration

AM Conservation Group shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Alternative Gene…

5
Altus Partners

5
Aludesign S P A

5
Aluminum Architec…

5
AM Technology

5
Am-pharma B V

5
Amag Pharmaceutic…

5
Amag Rolling

5
AM Conservation G… ◀

5

What this shows AM holds 5 patents at rank #44,510, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near AM

By rank, the assignees closest to #44,510 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E03C (Domestic Plumbing Installations FOR Fresh Water OR Waste…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in AM's primary technology class.

AM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

AM Conservation Group patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	40.0%
2023	1	20.0%
2025partial year	2	40.0%

Which technologies does AM Conservation Group patent most?

E03C - Domestic Plumbing Installations FOR Fresh Water OR Waste Water ; Sinks 4

B05B - Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles 3

E03B - Installations OR Methods FOR Obtaining, Collecting, OR Distributing Water 3

F16K - VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

AM Conservation Group's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

AM Conservation Group's lead technology class is E03C (Domestic Plumbing Installations FOR Fresh Water OR Waste Water ; Sinks), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E03C
Ranked #44,643 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare AM Conservation Group against Alternative Gene Expression S.L., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.