Where does Alliance Rubber Company rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Alliance Rubber Company ranks #44,596 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Alliance Rubber Company hold?

Alliance Rubber Company holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Alliance Rubber Company's Innovation Score?

Alliance Rubber Company has an Innovation Score of 33.0 out of 100 (43rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Alliance Rubber Company focus on?

Alliance Rubber Company's top technology area is G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals) with 2 patents, ranking #303 of 860 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Alliance Rubber Company's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Alliance Rubber Company's recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Alliance Rubber Company's patents?

Alliance Rubber Company's patents average 10.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Alliance Rubber Company patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Alliance Rubber Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Alliance ranks #44,596 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#44,596
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 43rd percentile
by Innovation Score (33.0/100): 10.6
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R44596 · US Corporation #44,596 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
LOWER-Q #44,596/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Alio
CPC-NARROW G09F · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.0/100
CLAIMS-PAR 10.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Alio, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Alliance’s 33.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (19%) Velocity 13.3 pts (40%) Breadth 7.1 pts (22%) Claim depth 6.4 pts (19%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Alliance Rubber · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Alliance's Innovation Score is 33.0/100 (43rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Alliance?

Each dot is one of Alliance’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Alliance’s own 10.6 claims/patent is at or below the 14.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Alliance vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Alliance's grants concentrate

Alliance Rubber Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Alliance sits between Alio, Inc. and Alloy Surfaces Company, Inc..

Alliance's three-year grant acceleration

Alliance Rubber Company shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Alio

5
Alite Designs

5
Alkhorayef Petrol…

5
Allez Health

5
Allied Flow

5
Allied Healthcare…

5
Alloy LED

5
Alloy Surfaces

5
Alliance Rubber ◀

5

What this shows Alliance holds 5 patents at rank #44,821, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Alliance

By rank, the assignees closest to #44,821 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G09F (Displaying)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Alliance's primary technology class.

Alliance's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Alliance Rubber Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	2	40.0%
2022	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%
2025partial year	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Alliance Rubber Company patent most?

G09F - DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals 2

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 1

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 1

B65B - Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Alliance Rubber Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Alliance Rubber Company's lead technology class is G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G09F
Ranked #44,596 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Alliance Rubber Company against Alio, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.