Where does Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. ranks #44,595 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. hold?

Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2020, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. has an Innovation Score of 27.8 out of 100 (25th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. focus on?

Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc.'s top technology area is C25C (Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production, Recovery OR Refining OF METALS; Apparatus Therefor) with 4 patents, ranking #22 of 77 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

Is Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc.'s patents?

Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc.'s patents average 17.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C25C (Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production, Recovery OR Refining OF METALS; Apparatus Therefor).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Alliance ranks #44,595 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 10 technology areas.

#44,595
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 25th percentile
by Innovation Score (27.8/100): 17.4
avg claims per patent: +50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R44595 · Foreign Corporation #44,595 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
LOWER-Q #44,595/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Allanson Lighting
CPC-FOCUS C25C · 10 areas
INNOV-THIN 27.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Allanson Lighting Technologies Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Alliance’s 27.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (22%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.2 pts (40%) Claim depth 10.4 pts (37%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Alliance MAGNÉSIUM · this assignee

28
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Alliance's Innovation Score is 27.8/100 (25th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Alliance?

Each dot is one of Alliance’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Alliance’s own 17.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Alliance vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Alliance's grants concentrate

Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under C25C (Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production, Recovery OR Refining OF METALS; Apparatus Therefor). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2018. By volume, Alliance sits between Allanson Lighting Technologies Inc. and ALLTrand, Inc..

Allanson Lighting

5
Alldata

5
Allflex Australia…

5
Alliance Automati…

5
Allnew Chemical T…

5
Allovate

5
Alltherooms

5
Alltrand

5
Alliance MAGNÉSIUM ◀

5

What this shows Alliance holds 5 patents at rank #44,492, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Alliance

By rank, the assignees closest to #44,492 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C25C (Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Alliance's primary technology class.

Alliance's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 25th percentile higher than 25% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	2	40.0%
2020	3	60.0%

Which technologies does Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. patent most?

C25C - Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production, Recovery OR Refining OF METALS; Apparatus Therefor 4

C22B - Production AND Refining OF Metals ; Pretreatment OF RAW Materials 4

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 3

C01F - Compounds OF THE Metals Beryllium, Magnesium, Aluminium, Calcium, Strontium, Barium, Radium, Thorium, OR OF THE Rare-earth Metals 3

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 3

C01G - Compounds Containing Metals NOT Covered BY Subclasses C01d OR C01f 2

B01D - Separation 1

C25B - Electrolytic OR Electrophoretic Processes FOR THE Production OF Compounds OR NON-METALS; Apparatus Therefor 1

C01P - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds 1

C21B - Manufacture OF Iron OR Steel 1

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc.'s lead technology class is C25C (Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production, Recovery OR Refining OF METALS; Apparatus Therefor), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C25C
Ranked #44,595 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Alliance MAGNÉSIUM Inc. against Allanson Lighting Technologies Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 27.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.