USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Albany Molecular Research, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 22 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Albany ranks #13,289 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 22 patents across 6 technology areas.

#13,289
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
44th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.3/100)
22.9
avg claims per patent
-84%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13289 · US Corporation #13,289 · 22 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 22 grants
  • MID-PACK #13,289/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH ACell
  • CPC-NARROW C07D · 6 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 33.3/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 22.9 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -84% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: ACell, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Albany’s 33.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Albany

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Albany's Innovation Score is 33.3/100 (44th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Albany?

Each dot is one of Albany’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Albany’s own 22.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Albany vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 21.921.92222.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Acsuper Technologies Inc. - 22, 14.23AcsuperACell, Inc. - 22, 16.86AcellADC Therapeutics SA - 22, 20.55ADC TherapeuticsAdvanpack Solutions PTE Ltd. - 22, 18.05Advanpack Solutio…Alcresta Therapeutics, Inc. - 22, 23.14Alcresta Therapeu…Alcyone Lifesciences, Inc. - 22, 19.68Alcyone Lifescien…American Maid Plastic Co. - 22, 1American Maid Pla…Amerlux, LLC - 22, 13.23AmerluxAlbany Molecular Research, Inc. - 22, 22.95Albany Molecular…
Albany vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Albany's grants concentrate

Albany Molecular Research, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (11 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Albany sits between Acsuper Technologies Inc. and Amerlux, LLC.

Who files at Albany's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Albany holds 22 patents at rank #13,281, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Albany

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,281 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Albany's primary technology class.

Albany's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 44th percentile higher than 44% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

051015 20152016201720202021 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Albany Molecular Research, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 11 50.0%
2016 5 22.7%
2017 3 13.6%
2020 2 9.1%
2021 1 4.5%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Albany Molecular Research, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Albany Molecular Research, Inc.'s lead technology class is C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C07D
  • Ranked #13,289 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Albany Molecular Research, Inc. against Acsuper Technologies Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 33.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.