Airguard Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Airguard ranks #30,773 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #30,773
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 12th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.2/100)
- 12.9
- avg claims per patent
- +67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R30773 · Foreign Corporation #30,773 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #30,773/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Afreeze
- CPC-NARROW B65B · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Afreeze GmbH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Airguard’s 23.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Airguard
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Airguard · this assignee 23
Airguard · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Airguard's Innovation Score is 23.2/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Airguard?
Each dot is one of Airguard’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Airguard’s own 12.9 claims/patent is at or below the 17.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Airguard's grants concentrate
Airguard Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 62.5% of grants classified under B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Airguard sits between Afreeze GmbH and Aktina Corp..
Who files at Airguard's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Afreeze
Afreeze GmbH
8 patents
- Agar
Agar Corporation, Inc.
8 patents
- Air Liquide Indus…
Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP
8 patents
- Airborne Internat…
Airborne International B.V.
8 patents
- Airhawk Internati…
Airhawk International, LLC
8 patents
- Akagera Medicines
Akagera Medicines, Inc.
8 patents
- Akeso Biopharma
Akeso Biopharma, Inc.
8 patents
- Aktina
Aktina Corp.
8 patents
- Airguard ◀
Airguard Ltd.
8 patents
What this shows Airguard holds 8 patents at rank #30,869, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Airguard
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,869 in granted patent volume.
- Afreeze GmbH #30,865 · 8 patents
- Agar Corporation, Inc. #30,866 · 8 patents
- Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP #30,867 · 8 patents
- Airborne International B.V. #30,868 · 8 patents
- Airhawk International, LLC #30,870 · 8 patents
- Akagera Medicines, Inc. #30,871 · 8 patents
- Akeso Biopharma, Inc. #30,872 · 8 patents
- Aktina Corp. #30,873 · 8 patents
Leaders in B65B (Machines)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Airguard's primary technology class.
- Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A. 231 in class
- The Procter & Gamble Company 152 in class
- KHS GmbH 136 in class
- Signode Industrial Group LLC 131 in class
- Krones AG 119 in class
- Multivac Sepp Haggenmüller Se & Co. KG 114 in class
- Graphic Packaging International, LLC 110 in class
- Altria Client Services LLC 96 in class
Airguard's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2021 | 4 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does Airguard Ltd. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Airguard Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Airguard Ltd.'s lead technology class is B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking), 62.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65B
- Ranked #30,773 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Airguard Ltd. against Afreeze GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.