AI Biomed Corp.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, AI ranks #34,121 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #34,121
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 35%
- by Innovation Score (40.6/100)
- 14.0
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R34121 · US Corporation #34,121 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #34,121/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Focus
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 2 areas
- INNOV-PAR 40.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: AG Focus LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How AI’s 40.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around AI
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- AI Biomed · this assignee
AI Biomed · this assignee
41 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows AI's Innovation Score is 40.6/100 (top 35% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for AI?
Each dot is one of AI’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). AI’s own 14.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where AI's grants concentrate
AI Biomed Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, AI sits between AG Focus LLC and Ailive Inc..
AI's three-year grant acceleration
AI Biomed Corp. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at AI's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Focus
AG Focus LLC
7 patents
- Agco Netherlands…
Agco Netherlands B.V.
7 patents
- Agents AIR
Agents AIR LLC
7 patents
- Agile Wind Power
Agile Wind Power AG
7 patents
- AI Metrics
AI Metrics, LLC
7 patents
- Aica Kogyo
Aica Kogyo Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Aiforia OYJ
Aiforia Technologies OYJ
7 patents
- Ailive
Ailive Inc.
7 patents
- AI Biomed ◀
AI Biomed Corp.
7 patents
What this shows AI holds 7 patents at rank #34,087, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near AI
By rank, the assignees closest to #34,087 in granted patent volume.
- AG Focus LLC #34,083 · 7 patents
- Agco Netherlands B.V. #34,084 · 7 patents
- Agents AIR LLC #34,085 · 7 patents
- Agile Wind Power AG #34,086 · 7 patents
- AI Metrics, LLC #34,088 · 7 patents
- Aica Kogyo Co., Ltd. #34,089 · 7 patents
- Aiforia Technologies OYJ #34,090 · 7 patents
- Ailive Inc. #34,091 · 7 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in AI's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
AI's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
41 Top 35% higher than 65% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does AI Biomed Corp. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
AI Biomed Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- AI Biomed Corp.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #34,121 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare AI Biomed Corp. against AG Focus LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 40.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.