USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 17 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL).

11
Total patents granted
17
CPC technology areas
20.4
Avg claims per patent
+75%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

AGC holds 11 US patents across 17 technology areas, rank #23,777 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#23,777
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 45%
by Innovation Score (37.0/100)
20.4
avg claims per patent
+75%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. at rank #23,777 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 17 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 20.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL). As a US Corporation, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 37.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 7 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a +75% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc.'s 20.4 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 17 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

How does AGC compare?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows AGC holds 11 patents, placing it at rank #23,777 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

AGC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 45% higher than 55% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 2015201620172020202120242025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 9.1%
2016 1 9.1%
2017 2 18.2%
2020 2 18.2%
2021 2 18.2%
2024 1 9.1%
2025 2 18.2%

Which technologies does AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. patent most?

Top 15 of 17 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Complex
Velocity Accelerating

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#23,777

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

37.0 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. hold?
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. holds 11 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 17 technology areas.
What is AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc.'s Innovation Score?
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 37.0 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. focus on?
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc.'s top technology area is F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL) with 5 patents. The company has filed patents in 17 CPC subclasses total.
Is AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc.'s recent filing velocity is +75% compared to the prior five-year period. This indicates accelerating innovation.
What does claim depth mean for AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc.'s patents?
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc.'s patents average 20.4 claims each. This indicates complex, broadly scoped patents that are harder for competitors to design around.
How is the AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

Guides to patent portfolio analysis

How to use this portfolio

AGC's 11 grants land it in the top 45% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - AGC ranks #23,777 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in F16L - see who else leads that technology area. F16L leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Explore the patent dataset

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.