Where does Aerocrine AB rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Aerocrine AB ranks #34,101 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Aerocrine AB hold?

Aerocrine AB holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2018, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Aerocrine AB's Innovation Score?

Aerocrine AB has an Innovation Score of 21.9 out of 100 (9th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Aerocrine AB focus on?

Aerocrine AB's top technology area is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties) with 2 patents, ranking #4,661 of 7,863 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Aerocrine AB's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Aerocrine AB's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Aerocrine AB's patents?

Aerocrine AB's patents average 8.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Aerocrine AB patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Aerocrine AB

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Aerocrine ranks #34,101 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 7 technology areas.

#34,101
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 9th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.9/100): 8.9
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R34101 · Foreign Corporation #34,101 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #34,101/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Advanced Medical…
CPC-NARROW G01N · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 21.9/100
CLAIMS-PAR 8.9 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Advanced Medical Balloons GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Aerocrine’s 21.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (33%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 9.4 pts (43%) Claim depth 5.3 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Aerocrine AB · this assignee

22
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Aerocrine's Innovation Score is 21.9/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Aerocrine?

Each dot is one of Aerocrine’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Aerocrine’s own 8.9 claims/patent is at or below the 14.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Aerocrine vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Aerocrine's grants concentrate

Aerocrine AB is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 28.6% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Aerocrine sits between Advanced Medical Balloons GmbH and Agiltron, Inc..

Advanced Medical…

7
Advanced Powertra…

7
Aeropress

7
Aeroscout

7
Afimmune

7
Agathon Maschinen…

7
Agile Transformat…

7
Agiltron

7
Aerocrine AB ◀

7

What this shows Aerocrine holds 7 patents at rank #34,256, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Aerocrine

By rank, the assignees closest to #34,256 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Aerocrine's primary technology class.

Aerocrine's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Aerocrine AB patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	42.9%
2016	3	42.9%
2018	1	14.3%

Which technologies does Aerocrine AB patent most?

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 2

B01L - Chemical OR Physical Laboratory Apparatus FOR General USE 1

B81C - Processes OR Apparatus Specially Adapted FOR THE Manufacture OR Treatment OF Microstructural Devices OR Systems 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

B81B - Microstructural Devices OR Systems, e.g. Micromechanical Devices 1

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 1

A61M - Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Aerocrine AB's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Aerocrine AB's lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 28.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
Ranked #34,101 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Aerocrine AB against Advanced Medical Balloons GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 21.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.