Adaptive Computation LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Adaptive ranks #44,403 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #44,403
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 14th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.2/100)
- 19.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R44403 · US Corporation #44,403 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- LOWER-Q #44,403/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Acumen
- CPC-NARROW G06V · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Acumen Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Adaptive’s 24.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Adaptive
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Adaptive Computation · this assignee 24
Adaptive Computation · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Adaptive's Innovation Score is 24.2/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Adaptive?
Each dot is one of Adaptive’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Adaptive’s own 19.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Adaptive's grants concentrate
Adaptive Computation LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding). By volume, Adaptive sits between Acumen Co., Ltd. and ADDÉNERGIE Technologies Inc..
Who files at Adaptive's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Acumen
Acumen Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- ADA Support
ADA Support Inc.
5 patents
- Adam
Adam S.A.
5 patents
- Adapt Solutions
Adapt Solutions
5 patents
- ADC Acquisition
ADC Acquisition Company
5 patents
- Adco Industries—
Adco Industries—Technologies, L.P.
5 patents
- Addon Optics
Addon Optics Ltd.
5 patents
- ADDÉNergie
ADDÉNERGIE Technologies Inc.
5 patents
- Adaptive Computat… ◀
Adaptive Computation LLC
5 patents
What this shows Adaptive holds 5 patents at rank #44,389, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Adaptive
By rank, the assignees closest to #44,389 in granted patent volume.
- Acumen Co., Ltd. #44,385 · 5 patents
- ADA Support Inc. #44,386 · 5 patents
- Adam S.A. #44,387 · 5 patents
- Adapt Solutions #44,388 · 5 patents
- ADC Acquisition Company #44,390 · 5 patents
- Adco Industries—Technologies, L.P. #44,391 · 5 patents
- Addon Optics Ltd. #44,392 · 5 patents
- ADDÉNERGIE Technologies Inc. #44,393 · 5 patents
Leaders in G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Adaptive's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 3,022 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 2,565 in class
- Google LLC 1,829 in class
- NEC Corporation 1,631 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 1,549 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 1,310 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,287 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,177 in class
Adaptive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does Adaptive Computation LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Adaptive Computation LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Adaptive Computation LLC's lead technology class is G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06V
- Ranked #44,403 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Adaptive Computation LLC against Acumen Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.