ACO Sevrin Ahlmann GMBH & Co KG
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E03F (SEWERS; Cesspools).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, ACO ranks #17,402 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 15 technology areas.
- #17,402
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 33rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.2/100)
- 11.1
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R17402 · Foreign Corporation #17,402 · 16 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
- MID-PACK #17,402/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Aadg
- CPC-FOCUS E03F · 15 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.2/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Aadg, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How ACO’s 30.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around ACO
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- ACO Sevrin Ahlmann… · this assignee 30
ACO Sevrin Ahlmann… · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows ACO's Innovation Score is 30.2/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for ACO?
Each dot is one of ACO’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). ACO’s own 11.1 claims/patent is at or below the 15.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where ACO's grants concentrate
ACO Sevrin Ahlmann GMBH & Co KG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 81.3% of grants classified under E03F (SEWERS; Cesspools). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, ACO sits between Aadg, Inc. and Adco Proucts, LLC.
Who files at ACO's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Aadg
Aadg, Inc.
16 patents
- Abzac Canada
Abzac Canada Inc.
16 patents
- Access TO Advance…
Access TO Advanced Health Institute
16 patents
- Accuragen Holdings
Accuragen Holdings Limited
16 patents
- Acon Optics Commu…
Acon Optics Communications Inc.
16 patents
- Acps Automotive
Acps Automotive GmbH
16 patents
- Action Streamer
Action Streamer
16 patents
- Adco Proucts
Adco Proucts, LLC
16 patents
- ACO Sevrin Ahlman… ◀
ACO Sevrin Ahlmann GMBH & Co KG
16 patents
What this shows ACO holds 16 patents at rank #17,400, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near ACO
By rank, the assignees closest to #17,400 in granted patent volume.
- Aadg, Inc. #17,396 · 16 patents
- Abzac Canada Inc. #17,397 · 16 patents
- Access TO Advanced Health Institute #17,398 · 16 patents
- Accuragen Holdings Limited #17,399 · 16 patents
- Acon Optics Communications Inc. #17,401 · 16 patents
- Acps Automotive GmbH #17,402 · 16 patents
- Action Streamer #17,403 · 16 patents
- Adco Proucts, LLC #17,404 · 16 patents
Leaders in E03F (Sewers)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in ACO's primary technology class.
- MAG Aerospace Industries, LLC 26 in class
- Zurn Industries, LLC 25 in class
- Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. 25 in class
- BIO Clean Environmental Services, LLC 22 in class
- SeeScan, Inc. 21 in class
- Ridge Tool Company 18 in class
- Thermaco Incorporated 17 in class
- Infiltrator Water Technologies, LLC 15 in class
ACO's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 12.5% |
| 2016 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2017 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 7 | 43.8% |
Which technologies does ACO Sevrin Ahlmann GMBH & Co KG patent most?
Top 15 of 15 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
ACO Sevrin Ahlmann GMBH & Co KG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- ACO Sevrin Ahlmann GMBH & Co KG's lead technology class is E03F (SEWERS; Cesspools), 81.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E03F
- Ranked #17,402 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare ACO Sevrin Ahlmann GMBH & Co KG against Aadg, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.