Acmeda Pty Ltd
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E06B (Fixed OR Movable Closures FOR Openings IN Buildings, Vehicles, Fences OR Like Enclosures IN General, e.g. Doors, Windows, Blinds, Gates).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Acmeda ranks #16,548 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #16,548
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 3rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (16.1/100)
- 1.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R16548 · Foreign Corporation #16,548 · 17 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
- MID-PACK #16,548/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Abbott Vascular
- CPC-NARROW E06B · 2 areas
- INNOV-LOW 16.1/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Abbott Vascular, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Acmeda’s 16.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Acmeda
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Acmeda Pty · this assignee 16
Acmeda Pty · this assignee
16 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Acmeda's Innovation Score is 16.1/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Acmeda?
Each dot is one of Acmeda’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Acmeda’s own 1.8 claims/patent is at or below the 18.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Acmeda's grants concentrate
Acmeda Pty Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 17.6% of grants classified under E06B (Fixed OR Movable Closures FOR Openings IN Buildings, Vehicles, Fences OR Like Enclosures IN General, e.g. Doors, Windows, Blinds, Gates). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Acmeda sits between Abbott Vascular, Inc. and Aerosol Dynamics Inc..
Who files at Acmeda's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Abbott Vascular
Abbott Vascular, Inc.
17 patents
- Accel Performance…
Accel Performance Group LLC
17 patents
- Acceptto
Acceptto Corporation
17 patents
- Accusoft
Accusoft Corporation
17 patents
- Actinium Phamaceu…
Actinium Phamaceuticals, Inc.
17 patents
- Advanced Cooling…
Advanced Cooling Therapy, Inc.
17 patents
- Advanced Testing
Advanced Testing Technologies, Inc.
17 patents
- Aerosol Dynamics
Aerosol Dynamics Inc.
17 patents
- Acmeda Pty ◀
Acmeda Pty Ltd
17 patents
What this shows Acmeda holds 17 patents at rank #16,579, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Acmeda
By rank, the assignees closest to #16,579 in granted patent volume.
- Abbott Vascular, Inc. #16,575 · 17 patents
- Accel Performance Group LLC #16,576 · 17 patents
- Acceptto Corporation #16,577 · 17 patents
- Accusoft Corporation #16,578 · 17 patents
- Actinium Phamaceuticals, Inc. #16,580 · 17 patents
- Advanced Cooling Therapy, Inc. #16,581 · 17 patents
- Advanced Testing Technologies, Inc. #16,582 · 17 patents
- Aerosol Dynamics Inc. #16,583 · 17 patents
Leaders in E06B (Fixed OR Movable Closures FOR Openings IN Buildings)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Acmeda's primary technology class.
Acmeda's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
16 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 29.4% |
| 2016 | 1 | 5.9% |
| 2017 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2018 | 8 | 47.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 5.9% |
Which technologies does Acmeda Pty Ltd patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Acmeda Pty Ltd's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Acmeda Pty Ltd's lead technology class is E06B (Fixed OR Movable Closures FOR Openings IN Buildings, Vehicles, Fences OR Like Enclosures IN General, e.g. Doors, Windows, Blinds, Gates), 17.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E06B
- Ranked #16,548 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Acmeda Pty Ltd against Abbott Vascular, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 16.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.