7AC Technologies, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 32 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F24F (AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR Currents FOR Screening).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, 7AC ranks #9,682 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 32 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #9,682
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 38%
- by Innovation Score (39.3/100)
- 26.8
- avg claims per patent
- -67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R9682 · US Corporation #9,682 · 32 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 32 grants
- UPPER-Q #9,682/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH 8×8
- CPC-FOCUS F24F · 12 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.3/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 26.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: 8×8, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How 7AC’s 39.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around 7AC
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- 7AC · this assignee
7AC · this assignee
39 score
- Aruze Gaming America · near
Aruze Gaming America · near
39 score
- Mivi Neuroscience · near
Mivi Neuroscience · near
39 score
- Qnovia · near
Qnovia · near
39 score
- Valqua · near
Valqua · near
39 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows 7AC's Innovation Score is 39.3/100 (top 38% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for 7AC?
Each dot is one of 7AC’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). 7AC’s own 26.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where 7AC's grants concentrate
7AC Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 96.9% of grants classified under F24F (AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR Currents FOR Screening). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (7 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2021. By volume, 7AC sits between Zoosk, Inc. and Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc..
Who files at 7AC's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Zoosk
Zoosk, Inc.
33 patents
- Zume
Zume, Inc.
33 patents
- iunu
iUNU, Inc.
33 patents
- ratiopharm
ratiopharm GmbH
33 patents
- 8×8
8×8, Inc.
32 patents
- 9224-5489 Quebec
9224-5489 Quebec Inc.
32 patents
- AB Sandvik Coroma…
AB Sandvik Coromant
32 patents
- Acadia Pharmaceut…
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
32 patents
- 7AC ◀
7AC Technologies, Inc.
32 patents
What this shows 7AC holds 32 patents at rank #9,682, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near 7AC
By rank, the assignees closest to #9,682 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in F24F (Air-conditioning)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in 7AC's primary technology class.
- Mitsubishi Electric Corporation 999 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 599 in class
- Daikin Industries, Ltd. 589 in class
- Johnson Controls Technology Company 410 in class
- Lennox Industries Inc. 376 in class
- Honeywell International Inc. 330 in class
- Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP 302 in class
- Carrier Corporation 264 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for 7AC, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F24F (Air-conditioning), 7AC ranks #35 of 885 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (39 here).
7AC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
39 Top 38% higher than 62% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6 | 18.8% |
| 2016 | 7 | 21.9% |
| 2017 | 5 | 15.6% |
| 2018 | 3 | 9.4% |
| 2019 | 3 | 9.4% |
| 2020 | 6 | 18.8% |
| 2021 | 2 | 6.3% |
Which technologies does 7AC Technologies, Inc. patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
7AC Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- 7AC Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is F24F (AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR Currents FOR Screening), 96.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F24F
- Ranked #9,682 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare 7AC Technologies, Inc. against Zoosk, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.