6over6 Vision Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, 6over6 ranks #17,392 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #17,392
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 48%
- by Innovation Score (35.7/100)
- 24.3
- avg claims per patent
- +1300%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R17392 · Foreign Corporation #17,392 · 16 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
- MID-PACK #17,392/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH 1087 Systems
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.7/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 24.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +1300% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: 1087 Systems, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How 6over6’s 35.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around 6over6
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- 6over6 Vision · this assignee
6over6 Vision · this assignee
36 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows 6over6's Innovation Score is 35.7/100 (top 48% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for 6over6?
Each dot is one of 6over6’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). 6over6’s own 24.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where 6over6's grants concentrate
6over6 Vision Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 68.8% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, 6over6 sits between 1087 Systems, Inc. and Aadg, Inc..
6over6's three-year grant acceleration
6over6 Vision Ltd. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 10 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at 6over6's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- 1087 Systems
1087 Systems, Inc.
16 patents
- 21imports
21imports LLC
16 patents
- 360° Ballistics
360° Ballistics, LLC
16 patents
- 4life Patents
4Life Patents, LLC
16 patents
- 89bio
89bio, Inc.
16 patents
- 915 Labs
915 Labs, Inc.
16 patents
- AAC Enterprises
AAC Enterprises LLC
16 patents
- Aadg
Aadg, Inc.
16 patents
- 6over6 Vision ◀
6over6 Vision Ltd.
16 patents
What this shows 6over6 holds 16 patents at rank #17,392, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near 6over6
By rank, the assignees closest to #17,392 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in 6over6's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
6over6's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 48% higher than 52% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2020 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 12.5% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 6.3% |
Which technologies does 6over6 Vision Ltd. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
6over6 Vision Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- 6over6 Vision Ltd.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 68.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #17,392 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare 6over6 Vision Ltd. against 1087 Systems, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.