USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

39F USA Inc

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 48 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, 39F ranks #6,863 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 48 patents across 0 technology areas.

#6,863
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
46th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.0/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R6863 · US Corporation #6,863 · 48 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 48 grants
  • UPPER-Q #6,863/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH A-dec
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 34.0/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
  • BOOK-RICH 8/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: A-dec, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How 39F’s 34.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around 39F

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows 39F's Innovation Score is 34.0/100 (46th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for 39F?

Each dot is one of 39F’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). 39F’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

39F vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 47.54848.54949.5 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Welldoc, Inc. - 49, 17.98WelldocXaar Technology Limited - 49, 17.82Xaar TechnologyYamazaki Mazak Corporation - 49, 15.47Yamazaki MazakYamato Scale Co., Ltd. - 49, 6.45Yamato ScaleA-dec, Inc. - 48, 10.12A-decAC Immune SA - 48, 24.92AC ImmuneArtemis Intelligent Power Limited - 48, 19.48Artemis Intellige…Assa Abloy Accessories and Door Controls Group, Inc. - 48, 12.65Assa Abloy Access…39F USA Inc - 48, 139F USA
39F vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where 39F's grants concentrate

39F USA Inc is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2024 (18 grants) versus a trough of 9 in 2023. By volume, 39F sits between Welldoc, Inc. and Assa Abloy Accessories and Door Controls Group, Inc..

39F's three-year grant acceleration

39F USA Inc shows 41 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at 39F's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows 39F holds 48 patents at rank #6,863, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near 39F

By rank, the assignees closest to #6,863 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for 39F, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

39F's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 46th percentile higher than 46% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

5101520 2022202320242025 7
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
39F USA Inc patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2022 14 29.2%
2023 9 18.8%
2024 18 37.5%
2025partial year 7 14.6%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

39F USA Inc's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #6,863 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare 39F USA Inc against Welldoc, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 34.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.