2m-tek, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E21B (Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, 2m-tek ranks #34,025 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #34,025
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 18th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.7/100)
- 20.7
- avg claims per patent
- -83%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R34025 · US Corporation #34,025 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #34,025/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH 123iv
- CPC-NARROW E21B · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.7/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -83% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: 123iv, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How 2m-tek’s 25.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around 2m-tek
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- 2m-tek · this assignee 26
2m-tek · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows 2m-tek's Innovation Score is 25.7/100 (18th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for 2m-tek?
Each dot is one of 2m-tek’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). 2m-tek’s own 20.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where 2m-tek's grants concentrate
2m-tek, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under E21B (Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, 2m-tek sits between 123iv, Inc. and 3VO Medical, Inc..
Who files at 2m-tek's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- 123iv
123iv, Inc.
7 patents
- 1touch Holdings
1touch Holdings Inc
7 patents
- 270 Surgical
270 Surgical Ltd.
7 patents
- 2840629 Ontraio
2840629 Ontraio Inc.
7 patents
- 3849953 Canada
3849953 Canada Inc.
7 patents
- 3b-fibreglass sprl
3B-Fibreglass sprl
7 patents
- 3datx
3datx Corporation
7 patents
- 3VO Medical
3VO Medical, Inc.
7 patents
- 2m-tek ◀
2m-tek, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows 2m-tek holds 7 patents at rank #34,025, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near 2m-tek
By rank, the assignees closest to #34,025 in granted patent volume.
- 123iv, Inc. #34,021 · 7 patents
- 1touch Holdings Inc #34,022 · 7 patents
- 270 Surgical Ltd. #34,023 · 7 patents
- 2840629 Ontraio Inc. #34,024 · 7 patents
- 3849953 Canada Inc. #34,026 · 7 patents
- 3B-Fibreglass sprl #34,027 · 7 patents
- 3datx Corporation #34,028 · 7 patents
- 3VO Medical, Inc. #34,029 · 7 patents
Leaders in E21B (Earth OR Rock Drilling)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in 2m-tek's primary technology class.
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 6,516 in class
- Schlumberger Technology Corporation 3,244 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 3,064 in class
- Baker Hughes Holdings LLC 1,273 in class
- Baker Hughes, a GE company, LLC 1,107 in class
- Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC 829 in class
- Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC 598 in class
- Cameron International Corporation 514 in class
2m-tek's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 18th percentile higher than 18% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does 2m-tek, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
2m-tek, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- 2m-tek, Inc.'s lead technology class is E21B (Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E21B
- Ranked #34,025 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare 2m-tek, Inc. against 123iv, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.